A: Yes—if you never include personally identifiable information (PII). Use de-identified profiles (no names, dates of birth, student IDs, addresses, exact dates, or unique descriptors). Keep identifiable data in your SIS/IEP system only, follow district policy, and review all AI output before it goes in the record.

A: Remove PII and swap specifics for general labels, e.g., “Grade 4 student with SLD-Reading.” Replace dates with ranges (“spring 2025”), locations with roles (“general education classroom”), and rare characteristics with typical descriptors. Template: “[Grade/age] student with [service/eligibility] shows [strengths] and [needs] in [contexts].”

A: Use AI for wording and structure (turning notes into clear, parent-friendly language). Do not paste raw scores with identifiers or any copyrighted test items. You are responsible for interpretation—verify accuracy against test manuals and your professional judgment before finalizing.

A: Use SMART/ABC framing with baselines and mastery criteria. Pattern:
“Given [supports], Student will [observable behavior] to [criterion/level] across [settings/conditions] as measured by [tool/method] by [date]. Baseline: [current level].”

A: Add a brief transparency note, e.g., “Sections of this report were drafted with assistance from an AI writing tool using de-identified information. The evaluator reviewed, edited, and accepts responsibility for the final content.” Follow your district’s guidance on disclosure.

A: Keep a consistent structure: Target goal → Probe/task → Student performance (data) → Level of support → Brief analysis → Next step. Example: “Reading fluency: 72 WCPM @ 96% accuracy with visual cueing; trending toward monthly target; increase timed practice to 3×/week.”

A: You can still use our templates and prompt patterns offline to guide human drafting. If AI is allowed only through approved vendors, copy the de-identified prompt into the approved platform, then paste the draft back into your district’s system for editing.